
← The Photon Field Operator ↑ →
The possibilities for interactions between Dirac particles and other matter are limited by covariance. The most straightforward interaction, known as the minimal interaction, is with a vector particle, the photon. I introduce its properties and extend quantum logic to describe the behaviour of a particle whose position cannot be determined directly because it is only created or annihilated in interaction.
Photons
At this point we have a non-interacting
Fock space and we have
Dirac particles. We want to introduce interactions between particles, such that the interaction operator has an invariant form. Since the
current density observable,
ja(x), is a vector, a covariant theory can be found by contracting it with another Hermitian vector operator,
Aa(x). The possibilities are severely restricted. The natural and simplest thing to try is to introduce a particle with a
spin index which transforms as a vector, and which is its own antiparticle, i.e. its creation and annihilation operators appear in the same field operator. Vector particles may have non-zero mass, but empirical evidence is that this is not so for the
photon at the limit of experimental accuracy. Zero mass is assumed.
Definition: The photon field operator is
Definition: The Hamiltonian density for quantum electrodynamics is
where e is an experimentally determined constant, known as charge.
With this
Hamiltonian density photons are always either created or destroyed in interaction. We cannot, therefore, talk of the measurements of the position of a photon, but only of measurement of the position at which it was annihilated, or the position at which it was created.
x is not the position of a photon, but rather the position at which a charged particle would be found to have emitted or absorbed a photon, if a measurement were carried out.
RULE VIIIb.
is the formal consequent clause “…, then a measurement would find the annihilation of a photon at x”.
RULE VIIIc. The photon wave function,
is the formal statement, “if
were known from previous measurement, then, in another measurement, the photon would be annihilated at x”.
Plane Wave Photon States
Since momentum is a conserved quantity, it is possible to talk about the measured momentum of a photon state. A photon created with a given momentum will be annihilated with the same momentum. So, it will be required that plane wave states are an orthogonal basis. First define a basis for spin states.
Definition: For momentum p,
w(p, 3) is a longitudinal unit 3-vector, w(p, 3) = p ⁄ |p|,
w(p, 1) and w(p, 2) are orthogonal transverse unit vectors, so that, for r = 1, 2, 3, w(p, r) · w(p, s) = δrs .
The normalised spin vectors are w(p, 0) = (1, 0) and w(p, r) = (0, w(p, r)).
Definition: For momentum p, the photon plane wave state,
, in H1 is given by the wave function,
where p2 = 0 (the mass shell condition) and λ is a scalar, to be determined.
The scalar,
λ, is required because the states

refer to the hypothetical measurement of position of the electron which emits a photon, not the position at which a photon can be measured. Photons are always created or annihilated in interaction, and cannot be in eigenstates of a position operator. It is not meaningful to annihilate a photon at the instant of its creation. We do not require that states,

, are orthogonal. Direction is determined by the distribution of matter, not by fundamental assumption, so λ depends only on the magnitude of
p.
We require that

is a delta function,
where
η(0) = −1 and
η(r) = 1 for
r = 1, 2, 3. The minus sign from
η(0) does not alter the expansion of the inner product for an
orthonormal basis. The braket for the photon is,
The resolution of unity takes the form,
We do not have

; the braket is not
positive definite, in conflict with the calculation of probabilities. In practice, we only need to generate probabilities for observations. We impose the condition that, in observations on the photon, there is no polarisation between time-like and longitudinal states,
With this restriction, probabilities for the observation time-like and longitudinal states are zero, and the braket reduces to
which is
positive semidefinite. It will be seen that all four polarisation states are required for the derivation of
Maxwell’s equations. We can conclude that the unobservable states have a real effect, and represent real particles, but the probability interpretation allows only the observation of a subspace containing the two transverse polarisation states, on which the inner product is positive definite. The braket is invariant under the addition of a light-like polarisation state, from which it follows that light-like polarisation cannot be determined from experimental results.
We require that the probability for the creation of a photon at
x and its annihilation at
y is covariant. Observe that
Then, setting
gives
which is covariant, as required.
Evolution of Photon States
We may expand

using a basis of plane wave states,
Then the wave function for the state

is
Since
p is the momentum vector for a zero mass particle, the wave function satisfies a
Klein-Gordon Equation,
Conservation of probability applies to the creation and annihilation of particles. Differentiating gives a first order equation as required by
Stone’s theorem,
The Photon Field Operator
The creation operators for a plane wave state is given by

. Substituting gives the photon field operator,
Theorem: The photon field satisfies ∂2Aa = 0.
Proof: Differentiate directly.
Proof: Differentiate and use absence of polarisation between light-like and longitudinal states.
Photons are Bosons, obeying commutation relations,
Substituting
p → −p in the second term gives the equal time commutator,
Since the integral is invariant, the commutator is zero outside the light cone, satisfying locality.
The Locality Condition for Photons
Because the photon commutator vanishes, the time evolution of the expectation of the photon field is trivial. Physical laws depend on derivatives of the photon field, not directly on
A. It is required that
locality is obeyed.
Theorem: The equal time commutation relations for the photon field and its derivative obey:
Theorem (locality) : The commutator for the photon field and its derivative is zero outside the light cone.
Proof: Differentiating,
and
Substitute
p → −p at
x0 = y0. Then, for
i = 1, 2, 3,
and, for the time component,
The integrals are invariant, so they are zero outside the light cone.
The Photon Field Operator ↑ Classical Electromagnetism →
There are no comments on this page. [Add comment]